HVCC is the new standards and procedures for residential appraisal orders. It was negotiated by FNMA and FreddieMac with the New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo in a settlement of a law suit brought by the NY Attorney General's office against Washington Mutual, a lender, and First American, an appraisal management company. The law suit was brought in November 2007 alleging the "appraiser colluded with Washington Mutual, one of the largest savings and loan companies, to inflate home values."
The HVCC procedures require mortgage brokers, who were not involved in the original lawsuit, to use
lenders and appraisal management companies, who were involved in the original lawsuit, to order residential property appraisals.
Did you catch that? The appraisal process is being entrusted with the appraisal management companies, the same industry that was cited in the original law suit.
Several problems were identified at the time by industry professionals and the implementation of the HVCC was delayed. Now, 2 months into the actual implementation of HVCC, the chief economist for the National Association of Realtors®, Lawrence Yun, pointed to HVCC as a contributing factor to less than expected improvement in existing home sales.
From today's NAR press release, "Yun said the appraisal problem is serious. "Lenders are using appraisers who may not be familiar with a neighborhood, or who compare traditional homes with distressed and discounted sales," he said. "In the past month, stories of appraisal problems have been snowballing from across the country with many contracts falling through at the last moment. There is danger of a delayed housing market recovery and a further rise in foreclosures if the appraisal problems are not quickly corrected." "
The mortgage broker's association, NAMB, is encouraging members to communicate with their local congressional representatives and local media about problems with the HVCC. They also are soliciting information from other industry professionals as well as from home owners and from buyers. Problems might include delays, low valuations, extra costs.
For me personally, I have not experienced problems with delays or low valuations. I have heard of problems with other mortgage brokers. For the most part the appraisal management companies have used the same appraisers that I would have used. And they have received the same valuation that I would have received.
I have seen no change at all in valuations.
What is different is the consumer is paying about more for that valuation.
What is different is the consumer has lost some flexibility with lender options because of difficulties with transferring the appraisal to a different lender.
What is different is that the local appraiser is burdened with additional paperwork in order to deal with the administration and procedures of numerous different appraisal management companies.
What is different is the local appraiser, a small business person with local ties to the community, is getting paid less for the valuation, even as the consumer is paying more. This means that more money is leaving the local economy and going to a large out of state corporation.
These changes do not make sense to me.
When trying to understand why an action was taken, I tend to look at the results and who benefitted from the action.
The mortgage process is not helped. The housing recovery is not helped. Consumers are not helped. Valuations are not better.
Appraisal management companies certainly benefit. Why would AG Cuomo seek to boost the revenues of appraisal management companies? Especially when one of the appraisal management companies was involved in the original law suit.
Judging based on the results of the implementation of HVCC it appears to me that the intentions of the New York Attorney General were to:
•· Increase consumer cost
•· Reduce consumer choice
•· Increase appraiser work load
•· Decrease appraiser income
•· Slow the housing recovery
•· Increase the income for appraisal management companies
Oh, and as I was writing this, I just received notice that one of the appraisal management companies ordered an appraisal from an appraiser who is on the lender's "Do Not Use" list. This means we need a new appraisal, we will miss the closing date, the borrowers will need to pay for a lock extension, and the sale is in jeopardy because we will need a contract extension.
Kind of makes me wonder about the quality of appraisers that the appraisal management company is using. My guess is that the QC standard for selecting the appraiser is the one who will work the cheapest. In this particular case, the QC procedures for approving a quality appraiser appear to be deficient.
At least the appraisal management company apologized. I wonder what the New York Attorney General thinks.
BTW, the appraiser on the lender reject list who was used by the appraisal management company is not someone that we typically would have chosen.
|
Thank you for visiting. This is the professional blog for |
|
Richard Smith Conventional, FHA, FHA 203k, HUD $100 down purchases, VA, Jumbo VA, Rural Development, Jumbo, FannieMae Homepath, Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC). |
|
Stearns Lending, Inc |
|
Cell phone: 423-280-0345 Email: Richard@HomeLoansChattanooga.com |
|
Visit my website: www.RichardSmithHomeLoans.com To inquiry about a home loan Begin Here |
|
Read my most recent articles in Scotsman Guide. |
|
This blog represents the opinions of Richard Smith. The posts and comments written on the blog do not represent the opinions or positions of Stearns Lending, Inc. |



